The Art Law Report Providing timely updates and commentary on legal issues in the museum and visual arts communities

Category Archives: Intellectual Property

Subscribe to Intellectual Property RSS Feed

Copyright Office Holds Hearing on Resale Royalty Legislation

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property

The United States Copyright Office solicited public comment last year on possible droite de suite, or resale royalty legislation.  As addressed previously, state law attempts to regulate artists’ rights to resale royalties have been struck down as unconstitutional.  Among the issues that the Copyright Office grappled with is the basic question of incentive: if a… Continue Reading

German Art Law Updates from the Dispute Resolution in Germany Blog

Posted in Copyright, Forgery, Intellectual Property

For those of us trying to follow art law developments in Germany, particularly to get access to original source and court documents in German, Peter Bert’s Dispute Resolution in Germany Blog is a terrific source.  Between the Hans Sachs collection case and the contuing fallout from the Wolfgang Beltracchi forgery scandal and the fictional “Jägers… Continue Reading

Velvet Underground’s Copyright Claim Against Warhol Foundation is Dismissed, Trademark Case Goes On

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property, Trademark

The U.S. District Court in Manhattan has dismissed the copyright claim filed by the Velvet Underground against the Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts over the iconic “banana” image from the cover of the legendary The Velvet Underground and Nico album.  Without reaching the merits of the claim, the court ruled that the Velvet Underground had… Continue Reading

California Law Struck Down as Unconstitutional: U.S. District Court Dismisses California Resale Royalty Act Case against Sotheby’s, Christie’s, and eBay

Posted in Collections, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Legislation

Consistent with expectations after reports from the court hearing in March, the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles dismissed the case brought by artist Chuck Close and others that alleged violations of the California Resale Royalty Act (the “CRRA”) by Sotheby’s, Christie’s and eBay, and ruled that the CRRA is unconstitutional in its entirety.  Similar claims… Continue Reading

Golan v. Holder—Foreign Works in Public Domain Back Under Copyright

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property

The Art and Museum Law Group issued today a client advisory on the implications of Golan v. Holder.  The U.S. Supreme Court upheld in Golan v. Holder the constitutionality of a U.S. statute (§ 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual… Continue Reading

Cariou Files Appeals Brief—Is this Case Less Transformative Than It Seemed?

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property, Uncategorized

Patrick Cariou has filed his much-anticipated responsive brief in the Richard Prince/Gagosian Gallery copyright infringement appeal.  Cariou’s brief makes its stand on the question of transformative use.  The degree to which a derivative work is transformative of a protected work is, of course, a central element of a fair use analysis about which Prince will have to persuade… Continue Reading

Public Domain Rights and Copyright Clash Over The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property

The 8th Circuit recently weighed in on the topic of public domain images and copyrighted characters.  As my colleagues Kimberly Herman, Michael Matzka and Laura Stacey explore in greater detail in an advisory about the decision, a number of merchandisers were using images from public domain posters and lobby cards from movies like The Wizard of Oz, Gone with… Continue Reading

Prince Copyright Appeal: Warhol Foundation Makes the Case to Reverse Infringement Finding

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property

After several months of inactivity, the first brief is available in the Richard Prince appeal of the judgment against him and the Gagosian Gallery earlier this year for infringing on the works of Patrick Cariou.  Prince’s arguments of “fair use” of Cariou’s photographs failed to persuade the District Court and the infringing works were ordered… Continue Reading

Christie’s and Sotheby’s Sued over California Resale Rights

Posted in Collections, Intellectual Property, Legislation

Christie’s and Sotheby’s were sued this week by several artists (including Chuck Close) as class action plaintiffs, alleging violations of California’s Resale Royalty Act.  The Resale Royalty Act is one of the few statutes in the United States recognizing artists’ rights to some of the proceeds of the sale of their works, even after the… Continue Reading

Confession in German Forgery Trial

Posted in Connoisseurship, Forgery, Intellectual Property, Restitution

On the heels of yesterday’s interruption and pressure from the presiding judge to accept a six-year sentence, the accused leader of a forgery ring in Germany apparently confessed today to 14 forgeries.  It’s been reported that he said that he enjoyed fooling collectors and experts.  It is anticipated that the other defendants will receive similar… Continue Reading

German Forgery Trial Update-Deal Offered?

Posted in Connoisseurship, Forgery, Intellectual Property, Restitution

We have been following with interest the trial in Cologne, Germany of four accused forgers.  The trial began at the beginning of the month.  Wolfgang Beltracchi, 60, is accused of organizing a scam that defrauded art collectors out of millions of dollars.  Comedian, actor, and writer Steve Martin is among the most high-profile victims.  The… Continue Reading

Richard Prince Copyright Appeal Survives Cariou Motion to Dismiss

Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property

The Richard Prince copyright case is in the news again, though probably more than it deserves.  Patrick Cariou, whose photographs Prince was found this spring to have infringed, moved to dismiss Prince’s appeal arguing that the injunction concerning the impoundment and destruction of the existing works (Prince was ordered to deliver them for destruction) was… Continue Reading